Filed under: Author - ACG, Politics | Tags: Democracy, Political symbols, Radio, Spin
On tour in Germany, candidate Obama praised the American spirit, calling us a “people of improbable hope,” and delivered an optimistic message to a crowd of 200,000+ Germans – many waving American flags. Striking the right tone in a time when our allies question America’s commitment to its role as sole hegemon, Obama declared himself “a proud citizen of the United States and a fellow citizen of the world.”
But Rush Limbaugh would have none of this, quote-mining Obama’s self-description to ignore the fact that he called himself first a “proud citizen of the United States,” and then blasting Obama for misunderstanding American exceptionalism, “deemphasizing” his American-ness, and placing our commitment to the world above our commitment to ourselves.
The intellectual mendacity involved in this decontextualizing attack is insulting enough to the American intelligence, but what’s really criminal, here, is the misperception of what American exceptionalism is. Limbaugh imagines American exceptionalism as a right inherent in our name – we’re America, ergo we’re different, and better than the rest – and an entitlement to walk alone on the world stage. Mr. EIB couldn’t be farther from the truth.
America wasn’t founded to get away from the rest of the world: it was founded to be a beacon of hope to the world, the city on the hill to which the rest of the world could aspire. Even if we’re better than the rest, we aren’t above the rest: we are, to borrow a distinction from the early Roman Empire, the “first among equals,” the princeps of the world. Like Augustus, while we exceed others in auctoritas (moral authority), we exceed none in potestas (brute force and named political positions). While exceptionalism entitles us to be different, and proud of our differences, it requires us to earn respect for our differences from the rest of the world, day in and day out, by living up to the high moral standard the rest of the world expects from us.
We aren’t better than the rest of the world because of the fact of America; we’re better because of the idea of America. We’re exceptional and owed our moral authority only to the extent that the fact lives up to the idea. If Barack Obama can make Germans believe in the idea of America, to the point that they’re willing to stand in a crowd of a quarter million and wave a foreign flag, I’d say he’s getting American exceptionalism just right.
Maybe that’s what Limbaugh’s really afraid of.
No Comments Yet so far
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
wow! what a beautifully written post. you have such a knack for expressing what we at didionville are continually discussing in the early-evening hours … were you that fly on our kitchen wall?
i have long said that obama is the guy to heal and strengthen our relationships with our allies and to remove the dented tin siding (courtesy of the last 7+ years) from our image, reminding the world that “we” are more than sum of our leaders.
Comment by didionsmommy July 28, 2008 @ 10:23 pmFlowery rhetoric sounds a lot better with specifics behind it.
Comment by Progressive Conservative July 29, 2008 @ 2:16 pmis that a criticism of obama or of limbaugh?
Comment by didionsmommy July 29, 2008 @ 2:54 pmToday I read an opinion article from Bob Herbert and I think he makes a good point on how outlandish the attacks on him are,…
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29herbert.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin
@PC They are not necessarily in every speech. I’m not sure speaking in front of a German audience about specific American policies would be that normal. Especially when he’s just talking about working together, both citizens and politicians.
Comment by oneiroi July 29, 2008 @ 3:02 pmOneiroi, I will echo what Harold Ford said about Obama after he got creamed in WV and then again in KY, “The guy needs to roll up his sleaves and start walking these states.” He’s made his point on the grand vision…the public wants specifics.
It’s also quite interesting what the German media is saying now that the magic has worn off.
Comment by Progressive Conservative July 29, 2008 @ 8:56 pmI know we’re going to disagree here, but my opinion is that his policies are available to anyone who wants to know them. They’re posted on his site, and they were all over the debates and speeches that covered specific issues.
As I was trying to say earlier, there are times when policy discussions aren’t necessary or appropriate as in Germany when American policies would not interest thousands of non Americans, but a differing philosophy on foreign policy might. He doesn’t need a flowchart on that.
And I really doubt that McCain has any more to offer on the points of specifics and so I’m a bit puzzled to what standard you are holding him. I feel like a lot of the speeches and sound bytes from both candidates are aimed at general policy positions and their philosophy of leading the country. When McCain gets up and talks about cutting spending, he doesn’t usually mention what specific cuts he would make. Especially currently in the press when what you read are just back and forths between “What Obama would do” vs “What McCain would do”. Which still are battling very broad ideological differences.
I personally think a lot of the attacks on the issue of substance are more aimed at deflating the energy and the appeal of Obama’s speeches , since I still say his policies are readily available.
Sorry so long. I has having a hard time of thinking how to express that succinctly.
Comment by oneiroi July 30, 2008 @ 10:58 am